Cold Skin

Cold Skin (2017)

My Score

We are never very far from those we hate.
For this very reason, we shall never be truly close to those we love.

This film is as vague as the reason why the nameless young man (David Oakes) seeks refuge on a rocky island in the Antarctic Ocean. Initially, he has to relieve another meteorologist. But the question of the captain what he’s running from remains unanswered. Did he do anything wrong during WWI? Or is an unrequited love driving him to this isolated island? No idea. And in the end, this isn’t important anyway. The problem is that the man he needs to replace is nowhere to be seen. The only living soul still present on the island is the primitive looking loner Gruner (Ray Stevenson) who’s hiding in a lighthouse.

Cold Skin

It’s rather unclear why those fish people attack at night.

Gruner isn’t very talkative. But soon the young man realizes that his safety isn’t guaranteed at night when water creatures start crawling out of the ocean. When the meteorologist sees his accommodation go up in flames after the first evening, he’s forced to stay with Gruner in the lighthouse. There he discovers that Gruner keeps such a female amphibious creation (Aura Garrido) as a kind of pet. She serves as a maid and as a sex object who’s being abused by Gruner. The reason why the creatures attack the lighthouse at night is rather unclear. Are these attacks a need of conquest? Or are these rescue missions?

Cold Skin

For me, this wasn’t horror.

I wouldn’t call it a horror. Or should the used symbolism frighten the viewer? A symbolism that shows how a man behaves towards strangers and even towards those it knows. Is it a reflection of the brutality we know in our society? The suppression of other individuals and the abuse that comes with it. Eventually, you are wondering who the monster is here. The ones who abuse a helpless being from the sea? Or the creatures who storm the lighthouse every night? Some admiration for the acting of Stevenson. He succeeds in showing that cruelty and madness in an excellent way.

Cold Skin

First “The shape of water” and now this. Something fishy going on?

I wasn’t really impressed by this film. The story isn’t really overwhelming and tends to be repetitive after a while. Despite the action-packed attacks and a few jump scares, this is ultimately just an average film. And the comparison with “The shape of water” is quite striking. The eradication of a fish-like being for self-profit and sexual interaction between this being and someone of the human race can be found in both films. The only difference is that in “Cold Skin” it’s a whole bunch of those ocean dwellers.

My rating 4/10
Links: IMDB

My Score
Your Score
[Total: 9 Average: 3.4]


  1. There´s a lot o symbolism and analogies.
    Its a turning wheel, it going to happen all over again
    and this might be the females creatures plan all along.
    Watchers: Intelligence is BEhind the eye of the beholder.

  2. This movie was stupid and gross. Very little plot. I guess Hollyweird wants to soften you to the idea of beatiality with a baby cross breed added in too omfg. An electric school clock in this “colonial lighthouse. No thought of anything realistic whatsoever. Endless ammo endless booze, huge amounts of sticks to sharpen not a tree in site. Seemingly volcanic island yet no volcano to be seen. Underwater shipwreck dynamite found with a “colonial pressure diving suit’ too much. Faceless masses of killed “toads”. Oh wait, toads live on land… they didn’t even get that right. Hollywood snowflake dimwits made this. Negative 3 stars

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.