The White King (2016)
Djata is a care-free 12-year-old growing up in a brutal dictatorship shut off from the outside world. When the government imprisons his father, Peter, and Djata and his mother Hannah are labeled traitors, the boy will not rest until he sees his father again.
Genre : Drama/SF
Country : UK/Germany/Sweden/Hungary
Lorenzo Allchurch : Djata
Agyness Deyn : Hannah
Ross Partridge : Peter
Alex Helfrecht, Jörg Tittel
My opinion on “The White King”
“They all will have to lose something.
If not you are a traitor.”
“The White King” takes place in a future society. Has there been a worldwide, destructive war? A deadly epidemic? Or did a world state succeed in shutting down global communication, after which they could conquer all the on high-tech depending countries by using conventional warfare? And after this invasion, did they install a totalitarian regime? You won’t get any real answers to these questions. It looks like a hermetically sealed off camp with no luxury and limited basic needs.
The regime can be called fascist. Even a sort of Hitler Youth is present. There’s militaristic tradition to honor “The Homeland”. The food supplies are managed according to strict rules. And apparently, each home is equipped with an intercom system where the daily production and practical information are announced. The Homeland is not a humanitaire society. It’s a society where coercion, control and punishment are key words. And this under the eye of strategically placed surveillance cameras.
Threats and oppression are a normality in this commune.
Djata (Lorenzo Allchurch) grows up in this commune. A continuing atmosphere of threat and oppression stands in the way of a carefree youthful life. Mischiefs are punished severely (with boxing irons). And when he tries to get a football back from some older bullies (probably sons of someone high in the military hierarchy), this turns into a violent fight rather than a kind of capture-the-flag game. In addition, his father is being arrested because of politically incorrect behavior. From then on, their live won’t be made easy. Their freedom is restricted and certain necessities are taken away from them.
Gloomy, sinister and cynical.
All this is taking place at the foot of an immense statue which can be compared (In terms of dimensions) with the Christ statue in Rio de Janeiro. But in appearance, it looks like an illustration from old Russia when marxism ruled. This image appears to be a portrait of the dictator who created this community. However, don’t expect further explanation about this. The symbolism used will obviously remind you of other past regimes. One regime stricter and more dictatorial than the other.
Despite the attempts to create a teenage atmosphere the atmosphere in this movie remains gloomy and sinister. Even with Djata searching for a treasure, visiting his influential grandparents and a short-lived intermezzo in a futuristic-looking building outside the guarded area. This is not a dystopian movie such as “The Hunger Games” or “Divergent” where a heroine overthrows the totalitarian regime. This is a rather cynical film about a not so unthinkable world in which human freedom is non-existent. To think that in our present world there are people who actually live in such humiliating circumstances.
Don’t expect some stunning footage.
The only actors who looked familiar to me, were Ross Partridge and Jonathan Pryce as Djata’s father and grandfather respectively. However, their roles were rather limited (although of significance). It’s mainly Lorenzo Allchurch and Agyness Deyn who deliver a brilliant performance. Allchurch’s naive look at the society he’s living in, is gradually being replaced by a determined attitude. It’s not always high-quality, award-winning acting. But it’s admirable to play such an important role at such a young age.
Deyn’s part wasn’t necessarily self-evident either. A caring mother who tries to protect her son. And who would do everything to get her deported man back. The movie doesn’t contain any magical and fascinating images full of special effects. There aren’t any battle scenes with rebels trying to overthrow a regime either. The story is generally fairly superficial and vague.
Certain scenes were quite unnecessary. Like the confrontation with General Meade. This was solely used to show that it all takes place in a distant future. The end is quite sudden and leaves you behind with tantalizing questions. In terms of mood the film is a succes. A sober and compromising atmosphere that feels like a lifelike nightmare. A nightmare that nobody wants to experience in person.